In approving a complete rewrite of the regulatory statute governing optometrists, the General Assembly – at the ACLU’s urging – took a modest step forward in eliminating troubling and archaic language that appears in most occupational licensing statutes. Many of those laws, like the one governing optometrists, allow the licensing body to take into account such things as an applicant or licensee’s “moral character” or any criminal record in deciding whether to grant, suspend or revoke a license. Over the years, the ACLU has attempted to limit the offenses that can lead to a revocation of a person’s license – and thus his or her livelihood – to crimes that relate in some way to the occupation. Otherwise, promotion of ex-offenders’ rehabilitation and reintegration into society is stymied. Under the amended legislation approved by both Houses, consideration of a person’s criminal record is limited to certain specified felonies. The Affiliate hopes to come back next year with an omnibus bill to do the same thing for the dozens of other occupational licensing statutes on the books.
Occupational Licensing
Session
2008
Related Issues
Related content

ACLU and RWU Law School Clinic Sue Again Over ACI’s Failure to...
June 13, 2025
Equity Impact Statements (S 805)
June 2, 2025
Sentencing Reconsideration Act (S 930)
June 2, 2025
NEWSLETTER - 2025 - Spring
June 1, 2025
Criminalizing Resisting Correctional Officers (S 1073)
May 30, 2025
"Sexting" Prohibition Expansion (S 955)
May 16, 2025
Aggressive Driving as a Violation (S 556)
May 16, 2025
Impounding License Plates for Driving Offenses (S 214)
May 16, 2025