Last year, Providence city officials persuaded the General Assembly to approve a bill authorizing the installation of automated “red light cameras,” but only after accepting a bevy of ACLU amendments designed to mitigate some of the privacy and due process concerns they raise. Significantly, a three-year sunset clause was included in the law. However, on the last day of this year’s session, Providence Rep. John McCauley tried to get the sunset clause repealed. In a matter of hours, the bill was heard by, and reassigned to, two different committees, until it was finally sent to the floor for a vote. Thanks to a concentrated Affiliate lobbying effort, the full House took no vote on the bill. The ACLU pointed out to legislators serious questions about the cameras’ effectiveness, and noted that the purpose of the sunset clause was to give officials the opportunity to review data after a few years of their use.
Red Light Cameras
Session
2006
Position
Oppose
Related Issues
Related content

LETTER Re: Barrington Speed Camera Proposal
June 5, 2025
School Bus Cameras (H 6318)
May 30, 2025
Medical Ethics Defense Act (S 305)
May 30, 2025
Compassionate Care Act (S 151, H 5219)
May 29, 2025
Identity Theft Protection Act (S 1037A, H 6346)
May 19, 2025
Artificial Intelligence Regulations for High-Risk Models (S 627)
May 16, 2025
Reproductive Freedom and Gender Affirming Care Health Data Privacy...
May 2, 2025
Social Media Regulation Act (H 5291, S 929)
April 4, 2025