News from The American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island, ACLU of Rhode Island News, RIACLU News

Menu

Protecting Civil Liberties in Rhode Island for Over 50 Years

2005 News Releases

ACLU Sues Over Highway Billboard Restrictions

Posted: November 22, 2005|Category: Free Speech

Print
Share This Article
  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Twitter

The Rhode Island ACLU today filed a federal lawsuit challenging on free speech grounds state laws and regulations that allow billboard signs on buildings near highways only if the sign promotes an activity taking place on the property. The suit is on behalf of Anthony Joseph Vono and his business, Specialty Promotions, which have been cited by the state Department of Transportation for having a billboard sign that advertises “off premises activity.”

The building in which Vono’s business operates, on 101 Poe Street in Providence, includes a roof sign, which is visible on I-95 North shortly before the I-195 split. Earlier this year, when the sign was advertising the non-profit agency Casey Family Services, Vono was notified by DOT that he had to take it down because it advertised “an activity not occurring on the property where it is located.” Although a billboard sign was allowable, the DOT advised Vono that it could only advertise a business or activity taking place directly on the Poe Street property.

The ACLU lawsuit, filed by volunteer attorney John W. Dineen, raises a number of legal challenges to the state laws and regulations being relied upon by the DOT for its position. The suit argues that the DOT’s distinction between on-premises and off-premises messages “contravenes [Vono’s] First Amendment right to be free from content-based regulation of his speech.” The suit further argues that this distinction improperly disadvantages “non-commercial and political speech, which would generally fall in the off-premises category, more severely than commercial speech.” The suit also claims that the DOT has been “inconsistent and arbitrary in its application and enforcement of the rules.” The lawsuit seeks a court order striking down the applicable provisions that make this distinction.

Attorney Dineen said today: “The government certainly can regulate safety issues on highways. But how can it justify telling Mr. Vono he has to change the message if he wants to keep his sign?” Dineen noted that Vono previously had a “Carcieri for Governor” sign on the same billboard, and it was displayed without incident.

RI ACLU executive director Steven Brown added: “One need only take a short ride along any of Rhode Island’s major highways to see that Mr. Vono has been singled out for arbitrary treatment. His is far from the only sign carrying off-premises advertising. It is important to emphasize that the issue in this case is not whether billboards are good or bad. It is whether the state should have the right to decide what a particular billboard sign can say. We think the simple answer to that should be ‘no.’”

See All 2005 News Articles >